Opinion of politically minded Indians about Bangladesh

1. Due to dictatorship, Sheikh Hasina had to flee the
country.

2. Comparing the coup in Bangladesh with Narendra Modi.

By comparison, most people are saying that this is how
dictatorship ends. One day Narendra Modi may also have to run away.

PM Narendra Modi and Sheikh Hasina

“The foolishness of people can be seen in these
comments.

If we consider the facts, then Khadiza Zia was winning with
a majority of votes at that time, where was this crowd then? In a democracy,
the most powerful weapon is the power of voting. The people of Bangladesh used
this power instead of taking a violent approach. Those who are supporting this
violence in India are indeed foolish, and they are waiting for another
country’s destruction to come. 

The most important thing is that Prime Minister Narendra
Modi was given a shock in this election, and the people voted against him by
giving him 63 fewer seats. This means that the people have put him in his
place. Therefore, those who are comparing Bangladesh with India are mentally
weak. 

The Indian Alliance, which is trying to distance itself from
its own mistakes, like the party that got defeated, is seeking revenge by
comparing Sheikh Hasina’s authoritarianism with Narendra Modi’s.

 It means that an authoritarian figure like Sheikh Hasina,
who was defeated by the people and did not even stop her authoritarianism, is
considered abnormal. Therefore, it is not appropriate to compare the situation
in Bangladesh with that in India.

 
History is a witness that every person who has a majority of
votes tends to become authoritarian. A person in power takes decisions that are
either in their favor or against their opponents. But this has happened in
every government. There are many examples of this in many countries. Therefore,
it is said that true welfare for the oppressed class can only be achieved when
there is a “weak but not strong government”.

 Will Sheikh Hasina’s departure have a direct impact on
India?

 Some extreme elements in India, who are affiliated with the
Congress alliance, are celebrating Sheikh Hasina’s departure as if it will have
a direct impact on India. But what will happen instead is that a new front will
open up, and the flow of refugees will increase. Hindus will be directly
targeted as they come to India.

 On the other hand, Bangladesh was making rapid progress due
to its cotton and jute production, surpassing India’s progress. This was
because Sheikh Hasina controlled the extremist forces and promoted commercial
activities. Now, the Jamat-e-Islami party will have a direct impact. The party
has a direct inclination towards China and Pakistan. Some ignorant Indians are
celebrating this without realizing that just 6 months ago, they had publicly
boycotted Indian products under Khadiza Zia’s leadership. When Indian products
were boycotted on a large scale, Sheikh Hasina took immediate action to stop
it.

 So, who will stop it now?

 Therefore, Narendra Modi should not be making noise about
something he has no control over. We should think about this instead of making
merry about something that is wrong for our benefit. It is foolish to celebrate
something that is wrong just because it benefits us. What is right and what is
wrong will be decided by time.”

 @Rashmi